amazon offers today india

cleartrip coupon code for domestic flights

Home / Featured / Court rules on case against Tambuwal

Court rules on case against Tambuwal

The motion on notice dated January 30, 2017 emanated from an earlier suit filed on January 27, 2015 by Senator Umaru Dahiru and Aliyu Abubakar Sanyinna.

Justice Gabriel Kolawole of the Federal High Court on Friday in Abuja struck out a suit seeking to remove Governor Aminu Tambuwal of Sokoto State from office.

The application was filed on the grounds that the primary election of the All Progressives Congress (APC) that produced Tambuwal for the 2015 governorship election was not validly conducted.

Dahiru and Sanyinna urged the court to order INEC to withdraw the certificate of return issued Tambuwal and present it to Dahiru on the grounds that the senator was the lawfully elected candidate of the APC at the primary election.

Ruling on the application for amendment filed by the plaintiff, Justice Kolawole, apart from dismissing the application, equally struck out the motion on notice.

The court agreed with the APC and Tambuwal that granting the application for amendment of the reliefs would change the “nature and character” of the case file which the Supreme Court remitted for retrial.

Kolawole said “the application of the plaintiffs is an ingenious attempt to have a second bite at the cherry and it is inconsistent with the reliefs sought in the motion on notice remitted from the Supreme Court.

“`The plaintiff had in his motion on notice filed, claimed that the December 4, 2014 primary election conducted by APC which produced Tambuwal was a `hallowed ritual’.

“The motion also said the election was a sham and in gross violation of Section 87 of the 2010 Electoral Act and the APC 2014 election guidelines.”

Justice Kolawole also said that granting the amendment would amount to “revalidation” of a primary said to be flawed by the plaintiff.

“Granting the application will occasion injustice on the part of the APC and Tambuwal because the motion on notice did not intend to cure any misnomer.

“Changing the case file is a fundamental issue of professional impropriety which must be not be tolerated.

“The amendment is an abuse of court process and intended to supersede the Supreme Court and outsmart Tambuwal, the 2nd defendant.

“In view of the fact that the application is dismissed, the case file has become empty and there is nothing to adjourn for or to be heard; consequently, the case is struck out,” Justice Kolawole said.

About Chika Ezeh

Check Also

Enugu Watch 15th December 2017

Share with us What you think about Enugu State, What the Government has Done and …

Leave a Reply

Be the First to Comment!

Notify of
%d bloggers like this: